Which two assessments are critical in determining the effectiveness of CPR?

The effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is primarily assessed through two critical evaluations: checking for a pulse and observing for signs of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

A pulse check is essential because it provides immediate feedback on whether the heart is beginning to regain functionality after CPR has been initiated. If a pulse is detected, it indicates that blood flow has been restored, which is a primary goal of performing CPR.

Monitoring for signs of ROSC is equally vital. ROSC is the period during which the heart starts to beat effectively on its own after being in a state of cardiac arrest. Indicators of ROSC may include the presence of a pulse, improvements in blood pressure, or changes in patient responsiveness or breathing patterns. Identifying these signs allows healthcare providers to determine if their resuscitation efforts are fruitful and inform subsequent treatment strategies.

The other assessments listed, such as blood pressure or breathing rate, while important in overall patient assessment, do not provide immediate indicators of the success of CPR. Similarly, medication administration and airway management, though integral to comprehensive emergency care, do not directly measure the effectiveness of chest compressions and ventilations provided during CPR. Skin temperature and patient responsiveness can aid in assessing the overall condition of the